Inclusive Medical Language: Terminology Guide

Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association – 7th Edition – 9781433832178

Page 348 Review

Navigating Inclusive Language in Medical Writing: A Commentary

In medical writing, precision and sensitivity are paramount, especially when discussing sexual orientation. The excerpt provides crucial guidance on using appropriate and respectful language, advocating for clarity and accuracy in terminology.

Defining Terms for Clarity

The importance of defining terms cannot be overstated. As the text highlights: “When using specific terms for orientations, define them if there is ambiguity.” This is particularly relevant when dealing with terms like “gay,” which can have different interpretations. The excerpt continues, “For example, the adjective “gay” can be interpreted broadly, to include all genders, or more narrowly, to include only men, so define “gay” when you use it in your paper, or use the phrase “gay men” to clarify the usage.”

This emphasis on clarity underscores the need to avoid assumptions and ensure that readers understand the intended meaning. Failing to do so can lead to misinterpretations and perpetuate harmful stereotypes.

Appropriate Terminology: Lesbians, Gay Men, and Gay People

The excerpt also addresses the preferred usage of specific terms. “By convention, the term “lesbians” is appropriate to use interchangeably with “lesbian women,” but “gay men” or “gay people” should be used, not “gays.”” This distinction may seem subtle, but it reflects a broader effort to recognize and respect the identities of individuals.

Using “gay men” or “gay people” instead of “gays” acknowledges the personhood of individuals and avoids reducing them to a single characteristic.

Avoiding Inaccurate and Pejorative Terms

One of the most important points raised in the excerpt is the avoidance of certain terms: “Avoid the terms “homosexual” and “homosexuality.” Instead, use specific, identity-first terms to describe people’s sexual orientation (e.g., bisexual people, queer people).”

The reasoning behind this recommendation is multi-faceted. First, the terms “homosexual” and “homosexuality” have a history of being associated with negative stereotypes and medicalization. As the excerpt notes, “Furthermore, the term “homosexuality” has been and continues to be associated with negative stereotypes, pathology, and the reduction of people’s identities to their sexual behavior.”

Identity-First Language: A Shift in Perspective

Instead of using these outdated terms, the excerpt advocates for “specific, identity-first terms.” This approach prioritizes the individual’s identity rather than focusing solely on their sexual orientation. For example, using “bisexual people” or “queer people” acknowledges the individual as a whole person.

The excerpt explains the significance of this shift: “These specific terms refer primarily to identities and to the culture and communities that have developed among people who share those identities. It is inaccurate to collapse these communities into the term “homosexual.”” This highlights the importance of recognizing the diverse experiences and identities within LGBTQ+ communities.

Understanding Prejudice and Discrimination

The excerpt also introduces terms related to prejudice and discrimination: “Homoprejudice, biprejudice, homonegativity, and so forth are terms used to denote prejudicial and discriminatory attitudes toward lesbians, gay men, bisexual individuals, or other sexual minorities. Heterosexism refers to the belief that heterosexuality is normative, as indicated in the assumption that individuals are heterosexual unless otherwise specified.”

Understanding these terms is crucial for recognizing and addressing the biases that can influence medical research and practice. Heterosexism, in particular, can lead to assumptions that overlook the specific needs and experiences of LGBTQ+ individuals.

Combating Heterosexism in Medical Practice

The concept of heterosexism is particularly relevant in healthcare settings. Assuming that all patients are heterosexual can lead to inadequate or inappropriate care. Healthcare providers must be aware of their own biases and actively work to create a welcoming and inclusive environment for all patients, regardless of their sexual orientation.

For instance, simply asking about a patient’s partner, rather than assuming they have a spouse of the opposite gender, can make a significant difference.

Conclusion: Promoting Respectful and Accurate Communication

In conclusion, this excerpt serves as a valuable reminder of the importance of using inclusive and respectful language in medical writing. By defining terms, avoiding pejorative language, and understanding the nuances of identity, we can contribute to a more equitable and informed healthcare system. The principles outlined here are essential for fostering trust, promoting accurate research, and ensuring that all individuals receive the care they deserve.

By adhering to these guidelines, medical professionals can demonstrate a commitment to inclusivity and respect, ultimately improving the quality of care for all patients. The use of precise language reflects a commitment to ethical and effective communication in medicine.

Buy full ebook for only $25: https://www.lulu.com/shop/american-psychological-association/publication-manual-of-the-american-psychological-association/ebook/product-vq6e7z.html?q=Publication+Manual+of+the+American+Psychological+Association+7th+Edition&page=1&pageSize=4